U.S. BLASTS CHINA AND RUSSIA FOR FAILING TO MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS TO FIGHT HUMAN TRAFFICKING *

STATE DEPT DOWNGRADED THE COUNTRIES, PUTTING THEM ON A PAR WITH N KOREA AND SYRIA *

THE U.S. ALSO DOWNGRADED UZBEKISTAN OVER ITS STATE-SANCTIONED USE OF FORCED LABOR IN ITS ANNUAL COTTON HARVEST *

PRES OBAMA NOW HAS 90 DAYS TO DETERMINE WHETHER TO APPLY SANCTIONS, ALTHOUGH THAT WOULD BE UNLIKELY *

TROPICAL STORM BARRY FORMS OFF MEXICO'S GULF COAST *

NATL HURRICANE CENTER SAYS THE ATLANTIC SEASON'S SECOND TROPICAL STORM IS DRENCHING THE REGION WITH UP TO 10 INCHES OF RAIN *

BARRY IS ABOUT 70 MILES EAST OF VERACRUZ, MEXICO, WHERE IT'S EXPECTED TO MAKE LANDFALL TOMORROW MORNING *

A TROPICAL STORM WARNING IS IN EFFECT FROM PUNTA EL LAGARTO TO BARRA DE NAUTLA *

ACTOR JAMES GANDOLFINI, BEST KNOWN FOR HIS PORTRAYAL OF MOB BOSS TONY SOPRANO ON THE HBO SERIES "THE SOPRANOS", HAS DIED *

THE EMMY AWARD-WINNING ACTOR WAS WORKING ON A NEW SERIES FOR HBO AT THE TIME OF HIS DEATH *

GANDOLFINI SUFFERED A POSSIBLE HEART ATTACK ON VACATION IN ITALY *

CO FIREFIGHTERS ARE CLOSE TO WINNING THE FIGHT AGAINST THE MOST DESTRUCTIVE WILDFIRE IN STATE HISTORY *

THE BLACK FOREST FIRE IS 85% CONTAINED AND OFFICIALS EXPECT TO HAVE THE FLAMES UNDER FULL CONTROL BY THURS *

HOWEVER, FORECASTED HIGH WINDS AND HOT WEATHER COULD HAMPER FIRE-FIGHTING EFFORTS TOMORROW *

THE FIRE HAS TORCHED 22 SQUARE MILES AND KILLED TWO PEOPLE SINCE IT SPARKED MORE THAN A WEEK AGO *

U.S. AND SEVERAL OTHER COUNTRIES WILL MEET IN QATAR THIS WKND TO DECIDE ON HOW TO RESPOND TO REQUESTS FOR HELP FROM THE FREE SYRIAN ARMY *

MEETING WILL INCLUDE GOVT OFFICIALS FROM 11 COUNTRIES IN THE SO-CALLED FRIENDS OF SYRIA GROUP *

TALKS COME A WEEK AFTER THE OBAMA ADMIN AGREED TO SEND ARMS TO SYRIAN REBELS AMID THE COUNTRY'S DEADLY TWO-YEAR CIVIL WAR *

FED RESERVE SAYS IT EXPECTS UNEMPLOYMENT TO FALL FASTER THIS YEAR THAN ITS PREDICTION IN MARCH *

THE FED NOW PREDICTS THE JOBLESS RATE WILL FALL TO 7.2% OR 7.3% BY THE END OF 2013 *

THAT'S DOWN FROM ITS PREDICTION OF 7.6% THREE MONTHS AGO *

THE FED ALSO EXPECTS THOSE RATES TO FALL BETWEEN 6.5% AND 6.8% BY THE END OF NEXT YEAR *

STOCKS CLOSE LOWER ON WALL STREET AFTER THE FED RESERVE SAYS IT COULD SLOW BOND PURCHASES LATER THIS YEAR *

THE DOW SANK 206 POINTS ON WED TO CLOSE AT 15,112, A LOSS OF 1.4% *

S&P 500 FELL 22 POINTS WHILE THE NASDAQ WAS DOWN 39 *

HOUSE VOTES TO CUT FOOD STAMPS BY $2 BIL A YEAR *

THE BILL CUTS ABOUT 3% FROM THE $80 BIL-A-YEAR FOOD STAMP PROGRAM *

THE CHAMBER REJECTED A DEMOCRATIC PLAN TO MAINTAIN CURRENT SPENDING LEVELS ON FOOD STAMPS AND CUT FARM SUBSIDIES INSTEAD *

HE WAS 51 YEARS OLD *

SLAM? BLAST? THOSE ARE NOT MY WORDS….MY WORDS WERE: “I DON’T AGREE WITH THEM” – that is different from slam or blast

Many media outlets have picked up on my GretaWire posting about my “disagreement” over descriptions of Hillary Clinton’s illness and taken it one step further (I think)  into a “SLAMMING” of my colleagues or a “BLASTING.”   Not at all.  I said “I disagree.” Their headlines overstate it.  My headline says what I meant: disagree.

If they think my written statement on GretaWire of disagreement (that is the word I used) is a ‘slamming,’ or ‘blasting,’ they should see when I really ‘slam ‘or ‘blast.’  They should talk to my husband.  :)

Below is the actual headline on the Greta Wire posting.  I wrote that I “don’t agree” and that is what I meant.  (Incidentally, in my own house we don’t always agree on everything but not every disagreement is personal or a slam or a blast! It is just a disagreement.)

Even the term ‘tad bit’ might have been a tip off that I was not slamming or blasting but ..yes, disagreeing.

Below is how news organizations took my headline and posting further and characterized it as a slam and a blast.

First, the “slam”

Second, the “blast”

 

 

 

Another headline has me “knocking” -

 

 

In retrospect….it really does show you the limitation of the written word (or my failure to write clearer.)  I really meant, as stated: I disagree.  That’s all.  I like to be able to disagree and have good debate.  I don’t find all disagreements fatal or declarations of war – or slams or blasts.  I don’t dislike people with whom I can disagree from time to time.

If you know me, and if you read that posting in my voice, you would not see anger (slam or blast.)  You would see/read a strong view about the need for all the facts in the Benghazi investigation.  We don’t have them. 

I can see how if you don’t know me, or if you don’t know my state of mind at the time of the posting, you might read more into the posting as some have obviously done so.  I need to write better so that others understand me better.  This is my failing.

Frankly I would have expected my strong views expressed in that particular posting on the failure thus far to get answers to the Benghazi murder to have had a bigger impact than my  ‘disagreement.’

PS – I am now taking a look at myself to see if I do this, too.