In case you thought the Benghazi controversy were over…think again. Below is a quote from NYT today (go to the NYT on line to read full article.) This is perplexing….weren’t the first reports internally from the CIA that Al Qaeda related groups were suspected? and isn’t that why the conflict with video allegation? I am not home and have spotty internet service so you should research it for us. Specifically, what were the first reports, and by whom?
Here is the NYT:
“…Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam….”